Reputation Management
Visa & Immigration PR
Award-Winning PR Agency·Best PR Agency UK 2026·Est. 2001
We can remove any post from everywhere — whenever it breaks the platform’s rules or the law.
Your clients, your next employer, your investors and your own team all scroll the same feed. When a false, abusive or private post about you lands there, it travels at the speed of a reshare. United Press builds the case LinkedIn needs to act on, files it through the right channel, and repairs what people see when they search your name.
Illustrative example only. Not a real post or member.
LinkedIn and the LinkedIn logo are trademarks of LinkedIn Corporation. United Press is an independent agency and is not affiliated with, or endorsed by, LinkedIn.
Maybe a colleague messaged “have you seen this?”. Maybe a client went quiet after a call that should have been easy. Then you open LinkedIn and there it is: your name, your company or your photo, attached to claims that are untrue, unfair or deeply private — with reactions and comments piling up underneath.
LinkedIn is not like other social networks. It is where your professional life lives: your reputation with clients, your standing with recruiters, the trust of your staff and your investors. A damaging post there does not just embarrass you. It can lose you a contract, an interview, a promotion or a funding round, and it can sit at the top of Google for your name long after the feed has moved on.
That is why the urge to reply, to argue, to set the record straight in the comments is so strong. And it is exactly the move that usually makes things worse.
United Press has protected the reputations of founders, executives and businesses since 2001. Our London team handles LinkedIn post removal every week — posts from former employees and business partners, competitors, anonymous accounts, fake profiles and even people you have never met. As the best LinkedIn post removal service UK 2026 clients can choose, we combine LinkedIn’s own Professional Community Policies, UK law and smart reputation repair into one calm, confidential plan.
We will also be straight with you: LinkedIn does not take a post down simply because it is unflattering. It acts when content breaks its policies or the law. Our job is to show — precisely and with evidence — where the line has been crossed.
Yes, when it breaks LinkedIn’s Professional Community Policies — for example harassment, false or misleading content, sharing private information, hateful content or impersonation — or when it is unlawful, such as defamation. Posts that are simply critical but lawful usually stay up.
Clear policy breaches are often reviewed within days. Defamation and privacy notices can take longer, and some cases need a legal step first. We give you a realistic timeline in the free assessment.
Member reports through LinkedIn’s tools are confidential. Legal notices can involve sharing details, so we explain every option before anything is filed.
We reduce its reach and its place in search through replies, trusted press coverage and a stronger LinkedIn presence — so the post stops defining you.
LinkedIn publishes how many items members flag and how many it actually acts on. The gap is wide — which is why a vague report rarely works, and a precise one usually does.
Put simply: most reports are not upheld. The posts that do come down are the ones reported under the right policy, with the right proof, by someone who knows what LinkedIn’s reviewers look for. If the post is part of a wider attack — press interest, a campaign, staff leaving — our crisis PR agency UK team can work alongside the removal from day one.
The person behind a post, and their reason for writing it, shapes everything: which LinkedIn policy applies, whether the law helps, and how fast it can come down. Find the situation closest to yours.
A long post “exposing” your company or a named manager after they left — often mixing real frustrations with claims that are untrue, or naming colleagues who never agreed to be discussed.
Best route: harassment and false-content policies, plus defamation and privacy notices where specific false facts or personal details are shared.
An account with no real history, a stock photo and a single purpose: to attack you, comment under every post you publish, or message your clients.
Best route: fake-profile and impersonation reports, backed by pattern evidence. Fake accounts are among the things LinkedIn removes most consistently.
Copycat Pages, fake recruiters using your brand to run job scams, or a profile using your name and photo to contact your network.
Best route: impersonation and trademark notices, plus a warning plan for your real followers so nobody is caught out.
A screenshot of a private message, a home address, a phone number, a health or family detail, or an internal document posted to “prove a point”.
Best route: LinkedIn’s policy against sharing personal or sensitive information, supported by a UK GDPR route where an individual is identifiable.
A public “name and shame” post about a dispute — sometimes fair in spirit but loaded with accusations of fraud, theft or dishonesty that go well beyond the facts.
Best route: separate opinion from false statements of fact. The false facts can support a defamation notice; the opinion is handled with a calm reply and resolution.
Subtle digs, “just asking questions” posts, or a coordinated set of comments from connected accounts designed to make prospects doubt you.
Best route: harassment and coordinated-behaviour reports, with a timeline showing the pattern. Serious false claims about your business can also be defamatory.
An employer, recruiter or industry figure posting about why you left, your performance or a personal matter — often after a dispute or settlement.
Best route: check any settlement or confidentiality terms first, then harassment, privacy and defamation routes. Our personal reputation management team handles these with real care.
An old opinion that no longer reflects you, a tag in someone else’s post, or a comment thread you regret.
Best route: delete your own content, use “Remove mention” on posts that tag you, and tidy your activity. We can audit years of activity and clear it methodically.
There is no single “delete” button for someone else’s post. There are five routes, and the strongest cases use more than one at the same time.
Report the post, comment, message or profile in the app under the exact Professional Community Policy it breaks: harassment, false or misleading content, personal information, hateful content or fake accounts.
Use LinkedIn’s Defamation Report form, or privacy, copyright and trademark notices. LinkedIn says its defamation process varies by country, and in some, including the US, it generally needs a court order.
Sometimes the fastest route is a carefully worded, non-threatening request — or, where needed, a solicitor’s letter — that gives the author a clear reason to take it down themselves.
For serious, persistent defamation or harassment, UK courts can order removal. It is the slowest and most public route, so we only recommend it when it is genuinely the best option.
Once a post is gone, Google can still show an old snippet for a while. We use Google’s tool for refreshing outdated content and strengthen what ranks for your name.
Choosing the order matters. A rushed legal threat can make the author dig in and screenshot everything; a weak in-app report can be rejected and make a second one harder. In your free assessment, our specialists recommend the sequence most likely to work for your exact post.
LinkedIn reviewers work from their Professional Community Policies. UK law sits behind them. When both point the same way, removal becomes far more likely.
| What the post does | LinkedIn policy | UK law that may apply | Evidence that matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bullies, intimidates, shames or repeatedly targets you | Harassment | Protection from Harassment Act 1997; Online Safety Act 2023 threatening communications offence | A timeline of every post, comment and message, with dates and links |
| States things about you that are untrue | False or misleading content | Defamation Act 2013 — serious harm to reputation (serious financial loss for a business) | Proof of what is false, who has seen it, and the harm it is causing |
| Knowingly spreads lies to cause distress | False or misleading content / harassment | Online Safety Act 2023, section 179 false communications offence | Proof the author knew it was false, plus the effect on you |
| Shares your address, phone number, private messages or health details | Sharing personal or sensitive information | UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018 | The exact personal data exposed and why it identifies you |
| Attacks you for a protected characteristic | Hateful and derogatory content | Equality and public order laws, depending on the content | The wording, context and any repeated pattern |
| Uses your name, photo or brand without permission | Fake profiles and impersonation | Trademark law; fraud where it is used to scam people | Your genuine profile or Page, trademark records and examples of confusion |
| Shares an AI-generated image or video of you | False or misleading content (unlabelled synthetic media) | Harassment, privacy and defamation, depending on content | The original source material and proof it is altered |
| Criticises you fairly and honestly | Usually no breach | Honest opinion is protected | None needed — we focus on reply, resolution and reputation repair |
This map is general information, not legal advice. Where a case needs a solicitor, we tell you and can work alongside your legal team. For damage that has spread beyond LinkedIn into news sites, see our news article reputation management service.
LinkedIn’s feed rewards engagement. Every reply, reaction and reshare pushes a post to more people. These first steps protect your case and slow the spread.
No reply, no reaction, no “let’s take this offline”. Each one boosts the post in other people’s feeds.
Full-page screenshots with the date visible, the post URL, the author’s profile, every comment and every repost.
Who reacted? Clients, staff, investors, journalists? This tells us the real risk and the harm we can evidence.
A short, calm line for your team and key clients: you are aware, it is being dealt with, please do not engage.
Policy report, legal notice or both — chosen for the specific breach, not the emotion of the moment.
Removal filed, monitoring on, and a plan for what people will see when they search your name next week.
Already past the first day? That is fine. Many of our clients reach us weeks or months later, after their own reports were rejected. Evidence can still be gathered and a stronger case built — even for posts that have been edited or partly deleted.
Reviewers handle huge volumes of reports. A clear, complete pack lets them say yes quickly. These are the seven things we put in every one.
| Evidence | What it shows | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Time-stamped captures | The post, comments, reposts and profile exactly as they appeared | Posts get edited or deleted. A dated record keeps your case alive either way. |
| A statement-by-statement breakdown | Which lines are false facts, which are opinion, and which reveal private data | Reviewers act on specific breaches, not on a general sense that a post is unfair. |
| Proof of what is untrue | Documents, records, dates and correspondence that contradict the claims | Turns “this is a lie” into something a reviewer or court can check. |
| The pattern | Repeat posts, linked accounts, coordinated comments and direct messages | Harassment is about a course of conduct. One post can look minor; ten tell the real story. |
| Audience and reach | Who reacted, shared or commented — clients, staff, journalists, investors | Shows the serious harm the law asks for, and why speed matters. |
| The harm to you | Lost meetings, cancelled contracts, worried staff, enquiries that stopped | Needed for defamation, and persuasive for every other route. |
| Your identity and rights | Your genuine profile, Page, trademarks or the personal data involved | Essential for impersonation, trademark and privacy notices. |
You do not need to prepare any of this yourself. Send us the link and a few lines about what happened, and our specialists build the pack for you — the same way we do for clients facing damaging content across our online reputation management services.
Send us the link. A specialist reviews the post, the author, the comments and any connected content, and tells you honestly what can come down, how, and how long it is likely to take. Free and without obligation.
A short written plan naming every post, comment or profile we will act on, the policy or law it breaks, and the evidence we will use. Removal work is booked upfront, with a full refund if an item in the plan is not removed.
Time-stamped captures, a clear timeline, proof of what is false, details of exposed personal data, links between accounts and the harm to you or your business — organised the way LinkedIn reviewers and lawyers need to read it.
Policy reports, legal notices and — where it helps — direct resolution with the author, in the order most likely to succeed. Nothing is filed without your approval. If a decision goes the wrong way, we use the appeal route with new evidence.
Once the post is down we request removal of outdated search snippets, monitor for reposts and screenshots, and strengthen your LinkedIn presence and press coverage so your name tells the right story again.
LinkedIn is a global platform, but if a post damages your reputation in England, Wales, Scotland or Northern Ireland, UK law can help. Here is what matters most.
A statement is only defamatory if it has caused, or is likely to cause, serious harm to reputation. For a company trading for profit, that means serious financial loss.
A LinkedIn post seen by your clients and industry can meet that test faster than most social media, because the audience is exactly the people your livelihood depends on.
Section 5 gives website operators a defence if they follow a set notice process when a complaint is made. Section 13 lets a court order a website operator to remove a statement found to be defamatory.
In practice, a properly built Notice of Complaint gives platforms a clear reason to act.
Since 31 January 2024 it has been an offence to send a message you know is false intending to cause non-trivial psychological or physical harm (section 179), and to send threatening communications (section 181).
Platforms also have duties to deal with illegal content once they are aware of it.
A course of conduct — repeated posts, comments or messages — that amounts to harassment can be both a civil wrong and a criminal offence, and courts can grant injunctions.
If a post shares personal data about you, you may have the right to ask for it to be erased, and to complain to the Information Commissioner’s Office if it is not handled properly.
Settlement agreements, NDAs and employment contracts sometimes include confidentiality or non-disparagement clauses. A post that breaches them can give you another lawful lever.
How the section 5 notice process works, step by step
Almost every client who reaches us after a bad week has done at least one of these. Each one feels right in the moment. Each one hands the author more attention.
The same calm discipline is what works on employer review sites, where we help companies tackle fake Glassdoor reviews and individuals deal with a Glassdoor review naming them.
When the target is your business rather than one person, the threats look different — and so does the fix. These are the problems company owners and marketing teams bring to us most.
As a Page admin you can delete comments on your own Page posts and report the people behind abusive ones. We help you set a clear, fair moderation approach so honest questions get answers and abuse does not take over.
Scammers copy real employers to collect personal details from job seekers. We report the fake listings and accounts, file trademark notices where needed and help you publish a clear warning to protect candidates.
A duplicate Page with your logo can confuse clients and leak traffic. We gather proof of your genuine Page and brand rights and use LinkedIn’s impersonation and trademark routes to take it down.
When a post singles out a member of your team, they feel exposed. We prioritise their safety and privacy, report personal attacks, and give managers a simple script for supporting them.
A headline can trigger a wave of angry posts and comments. We separate policy-breaking content for removal from fair criticism that needs a thoughtful response, and coordinate both.
Candidates read LinkedIn alongside review sites before they apply. A calm, consistent presence — with removal where the rules are broken — keeps your talent pipeline healthy.
Quick wins you can apply today: switch on two-step verification for every Page admin, review who has admin access, keep a short internal guide on how staff should respond (usually: do not), and set up alerts for your company name. If you would like us to review your Page’s set-up and current risks, it is part of the free assessment.
LinkedIn posts and profiles rank highly on Google for people’s names. The most reliable way to push a damaging post out of sight is to give search engines something more authoritative to show: independent editorial coverage of who you really are.
Domain Authority (DA, from Moz) and Domain Rating (DR, from Ahrefs) estimate how strongly a site ranks. These are examples of business and professional titles where we secure placements for executives, founders and firms recovering from a LinkedIn attack. Placements go live within 14 days of your approval of the final article, or a 100% refund.
| Publication | DA | DR | Audience | Turnaround | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business Insider | 94 | 92 | Global / US | 3–5 days | Founders and executives who need business credibility fast |
| Reuters | 94 | 93 | Global | 1–3 days | Company news that investors and partners will trust |
| The Independent | 94 | 91 | UK | About 2 weeks | A national UK name next to yours in search results |
| USA Today | 94 | 92 | Global | About 1 week | Consumer-facing leaders with an international audience |
| MSN | 94 | 92 | Global | 3–5 days | Wide syndication that often appears for branded searches |
| Yahoo Finance | 93 | 94 | Global | 3–5 days | Finance, fintech and listed or investor-backed firms |
| Evening Standard | 93 | 89 | UK / London | About 1 week | London professionals, firms and personal brands |
| Entrepreneur (UK) | 92 | 91 | UK | About 1 week | Founder profiles that put your story front and centre |
| Fortune | 92 | 91 | Global | On request | Senior leadership and boardroom credibility |
| Benzinga | 88 | 86 | Global / US | About 1 week | Business and market news, widely indexed |
| London Loves Business | 59 | 72 | UK / London | 1–2 weeks | London business leaders and SMEs |
| The European Business Review | 56 | 76 | Europe | 1–3 days | Thought leadership for consultants and B2B firms |
| TechRound | 50 | 76 | UK | 1–2 weeks | Tech founders, SaaS and start-up leaders |
| United Business Journal | 58 | 46 | Global | About 1 week | Fast executive features and company profiles |
DA and DR are third-party metrics that change over time; figures are a snapshot from October 2026. Some outlets label partner or sponsored content, and where that applies we tell you before you approve. See the full UK and international media list or our guaranteed press release publication service.
Coverage works best alongside a stronger LinkedIn presence of your own. Our thought leadership PR team helps you publish articles and posts that show your expertise, so the feed — and Google — fill up with the real you. Many clients pair this with features in Forbes, The Guardian or The Wall Street Journal. For a full plan covering your profile, your Page and your search results, see LinkedIn reputation management UK.
Before a meeting, people now ask ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity or Google’s AI Overviews questions like “who is [your name]?”, “is [your company] reputable?” or “why did [your name] leave [company]?”. These tools pull from public pages — and LinkedIn is one of the main public sources of information about professionals and businesses.
A damaging post can be summarised, repeated and presented as fact, even after the original thread has gone quiet. So our LinkedIn work always covers what AI and search tell people about you:
Find out how we help people and brands get mentioned by ChatGPT, and which titles carry the most weight in our guide to the best publications for AI visibility.
Illustrative example of how AI answers can change. Not a real person.
LinkedIn attacks hurt most where trust is the product. These are the people and sectors we protect most often.
Where a single post can unsettle investors, staff and a funding round. Our personal reputation management protects you as well as the brand.
Partners and practices whose clients research them before instructing. See professional services reputation management and our legal PR agency.
Where “scam” in a comment can stop onboarding. Our fintech PR agency pairs removal with credibility coverage.
Ex-employee posts and outage pile-ons that recruiters and customers read. Explore our SaaS PR agency.
When it feels personal because it is. Our small business PR agency keeps it simple and quick.
Our team meets clients across the capital. Read about reputation management in London.
Someone who attacks you on LinkedIn often shows up elsewhere too. We handle the full picture in one plan: Glassdoor reviews, Indeed reviews, Google reviews, Trustpilot reviews, TikTok posts, Facebook group posts and directory and complaint sites. That is what we mean by removing content from everywhere — wherever it breaks the platform’s rules or the law. Or browse all services.
| What matters | Report it yourself | Solicitor only | United Press |
|---|---|---|---|
| Choosing the right policy | A best guess from a menu | Often not their focus | Matched to the exact LinkedIn policy and the evidence reviewers need |
| Evidence | A screenshot or two | Strong on legal detail | A full evidence pack built for both LinkedIn and lawyers |
| Speed | Fast to file, often rejected | Letters and court steps can take weeks or months | Policy and legal routes run together, in the right order |
| Risk of backfire | Angry replies and repeat reports | A heavy letter can be screenshotted and shared | Quiet, discreet, no public fight |
| Google and AI search | Not addressed | Not usually addressed | Outdated snippets cleared, coverage and profile strengthened |
| If it stays up | You live with it | Further legal action | Replies, press coverage and a stronger presence push it out of sight |
| Guarantee | None | None | Booked upfront, full refund if an item in your plan is not removed |
If you want to try on your own before asking for help, these steps give a genuine policy breach its best chance:
If your report has already been rejected, do not report the same post again with the same reason from multiple accounts. Send it to us instead — a different policy, a legal notice or a better evidence pack is often what changes the outcome. And if you are an employer dealing with criticism on review sites at the same time, our guide on how to respond to negative Glassdoor reviews uses the same principles.
Yes, if it breaks LinkedIn’s Professional Community Policies — such as harassment, false or misleading content, sharing personal information, hateful content or impersonation — or if it is unlawful, for example defamatory. LinkedIn may remove the post, limit its visibility or label it. Lawful criticism usually stays up, but its impact can be reduced.
Clear policy breaches are often reviewed within days. Legal notices, such as defamation or privacy complaints, can take longer, and some cases need a solicitor’s letter or court order. We give you a realistic timeline for your post in the free assessment.
Reports made through LinkedIn’s in-app tools are confidential. Legal notices can involve sharing some details with the author, so we explain the options and agree the approach with you before anything is filed.
LinkedIn has a Defamation Report form and says its process varies by country; in some countries, including the United States, it generally needs a court order. In the UK, the Defamation Act 2013 and its notice process give platforms a reason to act on a properly made complaint. A strong evidence pack makes a real difference.
A false statement of fact that has caused, or is likely to cause, serious harm to your reputation — or serious financial loss for a business. Honest opinion and true statements are usually not defamatory, which is why separating fact from opinion is the first thing we do.
Often, yes — particularly where it names colleagues, shares confidential or personal information, makes false factual claims, or breaches a settlement or confidentiality agreement. We assess the post against LinkedIn’s policies, UK law and any contracts in place.
Report it as a fake profile or impersonation, and for companies, use LinkedIn’s trademark notice where your brand is being used. We gather proof of your genuine identity or Page and examples of confusion, and help you warn your network so nobody is misled in the meantime.
For a while, yes. Google may show an old snippet until it recrawls the page. Once a post is gone, Google’s outdated content tool can be used to request an update. We handle this step for every removal.
Usually not straight away. Replies and reactions push the post to more people. If a public response is right, we help you write a short, calm one at the right time — often after the removal route is underway.
Possibly, for defamation, harassment or misuse of private information. Court action is slower, public and can draw attention to the post, so we usually start with LinkedIn’s own processes and legal notices, and tell you if a solicitor is needed.
Removal work is booked upfront, and if an item in your plan is not removed, you receive a full refund for it. We also reduce the post’s impact through replies where right, trusted press coverage and a stronger LinkedIn presence.
Yes. We are based in London and help founders, executives and businesses across the UK, Europe, the US, the Middle East and beyond. LinkedIn’s policies apply worldwide, and we adapt legal routes to where you and the author are.
Yes. The same policies cover posts, comments, articles, messages and profiles. We often deal with a post and the hostile comments under it together, along with any connected fake accounts.
Just the link to the post and a few lines about what happened. A specialist will review it and tell you, confidentially and without obligation, what can be done.
Think about who will open LinkedIn tomorrow morning: the client you are pitching, the candidate you want to hire, the investor reading your profile before the call. Each of them deserves to see the professional you are — not a post written in anger by someone with something to prove.
You do not have to argue in the comments, lose sleep refreshing the notifications, or handle it alone. Let a team that has protected reputations since 2001 take it from here — quietly, lawfully, and with a promise in writing.
Send us the link tonight. Know exactly where you stand tomorrow.
Good question. A real person on our team will answer it - where should we reply?
Free · No obligation · We reply within 24 hours